Description of the SHAPE AND ROTATION OF (8567) 1996 HW1 bundle V1.0 ======================================================== Bundle Generation Date: 2020-02-28 Peer Review: 2016 Shape Model Review, Sat Dec 31 00:00:00 MST 2016 Discipline node: Small Bodies Node Content description based on the data set catalog file description for the PDS3 version, EAR-A-I0037-5-SHAPE8567-V1.0 ===================================================================================================================== Note: for PDS3 data sets migrated to PDS4, the following text is taken verbatim from the data set description and confidence level note of the PDS3 data set catalog file. In these cases, some details may not be correct as a description of the PDS4 bundle. We observed near-Earth Asteroid (8567) 1996 HW1 at the Arecibo Observatory on six dates in September 2008, obtaining radar images and spectra. By combining these data with an extensive set of new lightcurves taken during 2008-2009 and with previously published lightcurves from 2005, we were able to reconstruct the object's shape and spin state. 1996 HW1 is an elongated, bifurcated object with maximum diameters of 3.8 x 1.6 x 1.5 km and a contact-binary shape. It is the most bifurcated near-Earth asteroid yet studied and one of the most elongated as well. The sidereal rotation period is 8.76243 +/- 0.00004 h and the pole direction is within 5 degrees of ecliptic longitude and latitude (281, -31). Radar astrometry has reduced the orbital element uncertainties by 27% relative to the a priori orbit solution that was based on a half-century of optical data. Simple dynamical arguments are used to demonstrate that this asteroid could have originated as a binary system that tidally decayed and merged. The shape model is presented as a faceted solid in Wavefront .obj format. Also given are rendered .png images of the shape and tabulated rotation state. Known issues or problems with the data ====================================== See table 3 of Magri et al., 2011 for formal model uncertainties. The coordinate system is not precisely aligned to the center of mass and moments of inertia. In principle, offsets could be physically meaningful, but they are within the uncertainties for this model. PDS3 Source =========== Version 1.0 of this bundle was migrated from version 1.0 of the PDS3 data set EAR-A-I0037-5-SHAPE8567-V1.0.